Leaving a pot right on the coals

The third perek of Shabbat starts by discussing a pot left on the stove as Shabbat begins (Shabbat 36b):

משנה. כירה שהסיקוה בקש ובגבבא - נותנים עליה תבשיל. בגפת ובעצים - לא יתן עד שיגרוף, או עד שיתן את האפר. בית שמאי אומרים, חמין אבל לא תבשיל ובית הלל אומרים, חמין ותבשיל. בית שמאי אומרים, נוטלין אבל לא מחזירין ובית הלל אומרים, אף מחזירין.

You may not “place” a pot on a stove fueled by peat/marc/pomace (Soncino/ArtScroll/Steinsaltz) or wood, unless you sweep away the coals (gerifah) or cover them with ash (ketimah). Rashi explains the reason as the general rabbinic prohibition against insulating, hatmanah, with something that adds heat. Rabbeinu Hananel and others disagree, and say that the shehiyyah in this mishnah is a unique decree distinct from hatmanah. To this latter opinion, hatmanah applies to a pot resting directly on top of the coals, whereas shehiyyah applies to a pot with legs so it stands above the coals.

The safek of bein ha-shemashot

Shabbat 34–35 discusses the laws of bein ha-shemashot, the period of twilight between sunset and full darkness. This time has a status of safek, uncertainty, when it comes to laws that depend on the time being day or night. There was no way I was going to skip a sugya on uncertainty.

A berayta on 34b states:

תנו רבנן: בין השמשות ספק מן היום ומן הלילה, ספק כולו מן היום, ספק כולו מן הלילה - מטילין אותו לחומר שני ימים.

Bein ha-shemashot is a three-sided safek: it might be fully day, it might be fully night, and it might be some combination of the two. In any question of halakhah we treat it stringently, as either one, or the other, or both of the days that it bridges.

There are two main shittot on understanding the side of the safek that bein ha-shemashot could be both days. Rabbeinu Tam understands the safek to be that any moment between sunset and nightfall could be the dividing line for when the previous day ends and the new day begins. The Ritva (as understood by some aharonim based on a comment on Yoma 47b) understands the safek to be that the entire period of bein ha-shemashot might be ruled as both days intertwined, just as an adroginus might be ruled both male and female.

In this post I discuss Rashi's shittah on how this safek works. It's a shittah whose meaning is, well...uncertain.

Adjusting a timer on Shabbat

If you're looking for the laws of a timer on Shabbat, click right on through to the article by Rabbi Michael Broyde. This post discusses a related hava amina that caught my interest while learning today's daf.

The Mishnah on Shabbat 29b quotes a dispute about setting up a vessel to drip oil into your lamp:

לֹא יִקֹּב אָדָם שְׁפוֹפֶרֶת שֶׁל בֵּיצָה וִימַלְאֶנָּה שֶׁמֶן וְיִתְּנֶנָּה עַל פִּי הַנֵּר בִּשְׁבִיל שֶׁתְּהֵא מְנַטֶפֶת, אֲפִלּוּ הִיא שֶׁל חֶרֶס. וְרַבִּי יְהוּדָה מַתִּיר. אֲבָל אִם חִבְּרָהּ הַיּוֹצֵר מִתְּחִלָּה, מֻתָּר, מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהוּא כֶלִי אֶחָד.

The explanation of most commentators is that you may come to take the oil from the vessel, and thus violate the prohibition of extinguishing, mekhabbeh. Rashi here:

שתהא מנטפת — ויתקיים הנר, שתהא השמן מטפטף כל שעה לתוך הנר, וטעמא משום גזרה, שמא יסתפק הימנו, וכיון שהקצהו לנר - חייב משום מכבה, ואפילו אותה שפופרת של חרס דמאיסא ליה גזרינן.

Wool vs. cotton for your tallit katan

The Torah has several laws about beged, cloth. The most specific is about tsara'at, which affects cloth of wool or linen:

וְהַבֶּגֶד כִּי יִהְיֶה בוֹ נֶגַע צָרָעַת בְּבֶגֶד צֶמֶר אוֹ בְּבֶגֶד פִּשְׁתִּים: (ויקרא יג, מז)

The Talmud on Shabbat 26b presents a binyan av from that verse to teach that all mentions of beged in the Torah refer specifically to wool and linen. This applies to three other verses about tum'ah on a beged, and another verse saying that tsitsit goes on a beged. They all mean a wool or linen beged.

Everyone agrees to this binyan av. But the halakhot in these verses can still affect other materials, like cotton, when ribbuyim come into play. The question of which materials of which sizes are mekabbel which types of tum'ah is a huge debate on 26a–27b. Here are some charts (PDF). There's an even better chart in the footnotes of Mesivta.

The most practical example for nowadays is that of tsitsit. Is cotton acceptible for the beged of a tallit kattan? Or should you insist on wool?

The extra Hanukkah candle

Hanukkah time! Now that it gets dark around 5pm, it feels like the holiday is just around the corner, even though it's over six weeks away. But if you learn Daf Yomi, it's already here! It starts on Shabbat 21!

This post is based on shi'urim that Rav Reuven Taragin gave at Camp Moshava IO during the summer of 2010.

Rava on 21b says that you need "another lamp" in addition to the Hanukkah nerot:

אמר רבא: צריך נר אחרת להשתמש לאורה.

The continuation (by Rava himself?) discusses exceptions:

ואי איכא מדורה - לא צריך, ואי אדם חשוב הוא, אף על גב דאיכא מדורה - צריך נר אחרת.

What is the purpose of this ner aheret?

A squeeze on the Beit Yosef

This week, our topic in afternoon seder has been sehitah, squeezing liquid out of a solid on Shabbat. We came across an Eglei Tal that cites a Tosafot from today's Daf Yomi. It seems like Daf Yomi material comes up elsewhere in my day surprisingly often.

The Eglei Tal is “shocked” at the Beit Yosef.

Basics of tum’ah, part 2: how it works

This is a summary of the laws of tum'ah, ritual impurity. They were practical mainly when the Temple stood, even though they are still in effect today. May they all be practical again soon!

I discussed the meaning behind tum'ah in part 1.

Thank you, again, to Wikipedia and the Encyclopedia Talmudit. And again, for consistency, I transliterate טָמֵא as tame. And the verb מְטָמֵּא is metamme.

Table of contents:

• 1. What becomes tame
• 2. Levels of tum'ah
• 3. Transmitting tum'ah
• 4. Prohibitions for a tame
• 5. How to become tahor

Without further ado...

Basics of tum’ah, part 1: what it means

As the current few dappim of Daf Yomi deal with issues of ritual impurity, I thought I would help myself out by organizing the basics of the topic.

The Encyclopedia Talmudit was helpful in putting this together—thank God all the relevant articles start with ט, since the encyclopedia only goes midway through כ. Also helpful was, well, you know.

I'll go through mahshavah in part 1, and then in part 2 I'll outline the halakhot.

Mistakes about science

Today's daf talks about spontaneously generated lice. There's a dispute among tannai'm whether you can kill a louse on Shabbat (Shabbat 12a, 107b). Rav Yosef explains that the disagreement only applies to insects that "do not reproduce," but killing all other insects is forbidden (107b). The rishonim then discuss which species of insect are generated from sweat, from rot, from dirt, etc., or from eggs. The halakhah concludes that killing lice is permitted.

There are much more dramatic Torah-versus-science issues out there than this one. If you're looking for explosive controversy, you want evolution. If you're looking for out-of-date science in the Talmud, this collection is just a start; Pesahim 94b is a big one in particular. If you're looking for a legal and moral mess, look into organ donation.

But, even if relatively undramatic, the issue of spontaneous generation is centrally important to science versus Halakhah. It's unique as a black-and-white case of a canonized halakhah based on rejected science.

The Tur hungers for justice

Fitting that Daf Yomi gets to this agadta the same day we read Parashat Bereshit. From Shabbat 10a:

רב חסדא ורבה בר רב הונא הוו יתבי בדינא כולי יומא הוה קא חליש לבייהו תנא להו רב חייא בר רב מדפתי (שמות יח) ויעמד העם על משה מן הבקר עד הערב וכי תעלה על דעתך שמשה יושב ודן כל היום כולו תורתו מתי נעשית אלא לומר לך כל דיין שדן דין אמת לאמיתו אפילו שעה אחת מעלה עליו הכתוב כאילו נעשה שותף להקדוש ברוך הוא במעשה בראשית כתיב הכא ויעמד העם על משה מן הבקר עד הערב וכתיב התם (בראשית א) ויהי ערב ויהי בקר יום אחד

The square root of two

The Gemara on Shabbat 8a discusses a kavveret, a round basket made of reeds.

A drawing of a kavveret from the Steinzaltz Talmud (PDF)

The kavveret can be its own domain:

אמר אביי: זרק כוורת לרשות הרבים, גבוהה עשרה ואינה רחבה ששה - חייב, רחבה ששה - פטור. רבא אמר: אפילו אינה רחבה ששה - פטור. מאי טעמא - אי אפשר לקרומיות של קנה שלא יעלו למעלה מעשרה.

A house for hobbits

The Gemara on Shabbat 7a quotes the following statement:

והאמר רב גידל אמר רב חייא בר יוסף אמר רב: בית שאין בתוכו עשרה, וקרויו משלימו לעשרה - על גגו מותר לטלטל בכולו, בתוכו אין מטלטלין בו אלא ארבע אמות.

Soncino translates:

R. Gidal said in the name of R. Hiyya b. Joseph in Rab's name: In the case of a house, the inside of which is not ten [hand breadths in height] but its covering makes it up to ten, it is permitted to carry on the roof over the whole [area]; but within, one may carry only four cubits.

A diagram might help:

Tractate Shabbat: In and out and in and out...

Massekhet Shabbat discusses, of course, the laws of Shabbat. The beginning of the massekhet is structured chronologically, starting with the laws of Friday afternoon, then candle lighting on Friday evening, then cooking and insulating Friday night. The basics of the 39 melakhot don't come up until the middle of the seventh perek. The rest of the 24 perakim then flow from topic to topic.

But amidst this structure, a surprising topic dominates the first half of the massekhet: hotsa'ah, the melakhah of carrying between a private and public domain. Eight out of the first eleven chapters of the massekhet contain mishnayot about hotsa'ah, and it is the sole topic of five of those chapters: 5, 6, 8, 9, and 11. And most strangely, the very first mishnah of the massekhet is a total non sequitur to the rest of the first perek—a mishnah about, you guessed it, hotsa'ah.

Adding to the surprise, when the Mishnah lists the 39 melakhot in the seventh perek, hotsa'ah is last on the list. And the first Tosafot on the first amud calls it a melakhah geru'ah, an "inferior" melakhah.

So why the focus on hotsa'ah? Why does it get so many chapters? Why is it tacked on to the beginning of the tractate?